These ponderings had been in the back of my mind since the beginning of September but really came to the fore this week as I was attempting to write a paper on the similarities and differences between Deuteronomistic History and Chronicles, and their implications. I have a background in psychology and here I am studying Bible/theology. The language is different, the way of thinking is different, and the research is different. I was told last week by another student that I have a huge advantage because I grew up in the church and I also minored in Biblical and Theological Studies in my undergrad, which is true, but I still feel out of the loop. When I listen to other students articulate their thoughts in class they seem to have it all together. When fellow classmates speak out of their pastoral experience I feel like I have a long way to go in understanding. And yet, when I commented to someone about how I didn't have a clue whether or not my contribution to a class discussion was relevant he said that he sat across the room and was feeling the same way in light of what I had contributed. Are we all just a group of people, attempting to speak the right language or articulate lofty ideas when really we just want to ask the questions that are on our minds? Maybe this is a Mennonite fault (some call it humility), but why is it that we don't feel smart enough to be here? And how can I contribute to the creation of a space here at seminary where we can all doubt and question and wonder together?
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
One confused body...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I realized when I came back to this entry later that I could be accused of using theological language in the title...just can't get away from it!
Makes me wonder how Nathan would ever do in that type of environment...but then again, he thrives on theology and big words and lofty questions...though he has mentioned many times that he doesn't think he's smart enough...
Post a Comment